Homosexuals have invaded Catholic churches, taken communion and spit the hosts back at the priests and then thrown condoms around. Other homosexuals have produced plays depicting Jesus as a homosexual and his mother, Mary, as a lesbian. Offensive and outrageous behavior has served homosexuals very well politically.
[Village Chronicles] Editor George Safford complains that murdering abortionists restricts his own freedom. Apparently, restricting his freedom constitutes a major moral infraction of more than cosmic proportions. However, he does not explain why murdering innocent human beings in the womb and thereby restricting their freedom is acceptable.
While anti-abortionists have murdered abortionists like George Tiller, in their belief-system, the abortionists were guilty. That fact is not in dispute. But Safford had nothing to say about homosexuals who murdered innocent persons to advance a political agenda. Kimberly Bergalis, a young woman, died from AIDS because her dentist deliberately infected her with a deadly virus to force the federal government into funding AIDS research. Once again, we see that outrageous and harmful behavior works to the benefit of the homosexual agenda.
Homosexuals can both use outrageous stunts to advance their agenda and condemn them when opponents use them, because they are morally superior persons. Morally superior persons do not submit to any moral authority except their own. Morally inferior persons, such as Catholics, are inferior because they submit to the moral authority of the Pope.
In other words, nothing restricts the behavior of a politically active homosexual—nothing, not the Pope, not the Bible, not logic, not even historical fact.
On the one hand, such a person is unpredictable, a loose cannon. On the other, he is a predator in waiting, like Bergalis’ dentist. He cannot be trusted, and he is not fit for civil life.
I also read that story from the Associated Press (AP), reporting on a Catholic school which refused to admit a boy because his mother and her consort are lesbians. The story aroused sympathy for the lesbians and incited hatred against the Church.
What the article did not ask was this simple question: Why would a lesbian send her child to a Catholic school? Didn’t she know that the Catholic religion defines homosexuality as profoundly immoral? Why would she send her son to a school which tells him that his mother is living in sin? And why would the AP make a story out of this?
The answer is that the event was another offensive and outrageous stunt to embarrass the Church and force it to change its doctrine to bring it into line with the beliefs of ‘tolerant’ homosexuals.
George Kocan
27w179
